adcount=1;
"A cruel debate opponent" "Pagan blasphemer" "Reverse-iconoclast" "don't get pissed at him b/c he pwn yalls whiney asses"
My Photo
Name:
Location: Indiana, United States

Miscellaneous meanderings and philosophical ramblings. The title from a spiral notebook I used to jot down my thoughts on religion and other matters some years ago. I like to write, think and express my views on various issues. Robust discussion is welcome.


Chris of Rights and Charles Martin <-- Lists of debunked Sarah Palin rumors

"Lan astaslem."
I will not submit. I will not surrender.

Monday, February 18, 2008

Bill Clinton wants to jail mothers and doctors


At least he did, until he decided to kill more babies.

Just thought I would descend to the same level of reckless hyperbole that Bill Clinton managed, when he replied to pro-life protesters at a recent campaign event. Unfortunately, I failed at reaching his depth of foolishness as he also made sweeping generalizations, avoided the real arguments on the issue and essentially committed an ad hominem fallacy while avoiding his own previous views.

Watch the video here and then note that Bill Clinton used to be prolife until the late 80s and as for doing more than anyone to reduce the number of abortions, he twice vetoed partial birth abortion bans, despite the large approval for such a ban.

But hey, can't expect Mr. "depends on what is means", to fairly or accurately address an issue, even when it includes his own history.

---

Filed under: Politics -- Abortion

Trackposted to: DragonLady's World, Right Truth, Shadowscope, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog's Weblog, A Newt One, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions

Sunday, February 10, 2008

OTA Open Trackback 02.11.08


As the lovely Samantha Burns says:

Please use this space to trackback your best, main page articles (I just require a link to this article, as always). Also, if you have something to discuss, it is welcomed here as well.

ADVICE: Trackback main blog page articles to showcase your work (and it will help to attract readers).

Yep, I was in a plagiarizing mood ;-) Nevertheless, it's a good way to draw more attention to your blog, so trackback away :-) I'll have one of these each Monday, because, well, I hate Mondays ;-p

Please refrain from using international accent marks in your post URL. The inline trackback script will fail if those are used.

Do NOT link your open trackback post here. Use Linkfest Haven instead.

63126210_cf86211d09_o

More trackback partys, open posts and linkfests can be found at:

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis

Filed under: OpenTrackback

Disclaimer: trackbacks do not necessarily represent the opinions or standards of Mark My Words

Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

Election 2008 - Is staying home an option?


This post was prompted by the following comment left at a previous post, where I stated I might sit out the election if it ends up being a McCain/Huckabee ticket.

Great post... thanks! One small quibble: please don't stay home... you can vote 3rd party or abstain from voting for president, but I REALLY hope conservatives who cannot vote for McCain still show up and give support to Republicans in other important races.

Ryan

That's a good point Ryan makes and something I really had not thought of till now. Let's further reinforce this with what Mark Levin has to say with an excerpt from his post at the Corner.

"I think one important focus of Reagan conservatives should be to do all they can to protect as many Republican seats in the House as possible. There needs to be at least one elected part of our government that might be in a position to stem what could be a very unpleasant four years." (source, thanks to Glenn Reynolds)

Wikipedia has a decent round up of information for the United States House of Representatives elections, 2008.

Seems to me, that no matter how loathsome the Republican Presidential ticket may turn out to be, staying home is NOT an option. We need to vote for as many Republican candidates as we can, even if we decide to not cast a vote for President. Thanks to Ryan for pointing this out.

Let's not become so disgruntled that we miss seeing what good we can do.

---

Filed  under: Politics

Trackposted to: Right Pundits, Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary's Thoughts, A Blog For All, A Newt One- Shared News!, Right Truth, DragonLady's World, A Newt One- BIG THURSDAY GUEST!, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog's Weblog, Cao's Blog, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, Allie is Wired, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Wolf Pangloss, Dumb Ox Daily News, A Newt One, Stageleft, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions

McCain at CPAC, will it be enough?


Words and more words, but what of actions?

No doubt McCain will try to reach out to conservatives. After all, we've only got two eyes to poke at and he already did that some time ago. But a speech is a very difficult way to address substantial questions about his record and things he's reportedly said before the speech he'll make at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) tomorrow.

Excerpts from several sources illustrate McCain's self-created difficulties:

“He [Michael Graham] also mentioned my abridgement of First Amendment rights, i.e. talking about campaign finance reform….I know that money corrupts….I would rather have a clean government than one where quote First Amendment rights are being respected, that has become corrupt. If I had my choice, I’d rather have the clean government.” (source)

---

Fund wrote that McCain “has told conservatives he would be happy to appoint the likes of Chief Justice Roberts to the Supreme Court. But he indicated he might draw the line on a Samuel Alito because ‘he wore his conservatism on his sleeve.’ ” (source)

And let's not forget amnesty. Mitt Romney was mistaken about what his ad said, but McCain did say comprehensive reform would require amnesty and recently said he would still sign the bill if it came across his desk.

“Amnesty has to be an important part because there are people who have lived in this country for 20, 30 or 40 years, who have raised children here and pay taxes here and are not citizens. That has to be a component of it.”

“I think we can set up a program where amnesty is extended to a certain number of people who are eligible and at the same time make sure that we have some control over people" (source)

Just because Michael Medved calls us liars for saying McCain supports amnesty doesn't make it so. It appears Medved is willing to accept McCain's definition of amnesty and use that to say that if we disagree we're just dishonest. Well, two can play that game. If we use Medved's method, we can easily call him a liar, since he disagrees with our definition of amnesty. He can't complain about that as we're using his standard by which to make the judgement.

Can any one speech overcome McCain's issues with conservatives who are threatening to stay home or even vote for Hillary? Issues that he has created by the way. At best, he may get some votes, but I doubt he can create enthusiasm beyond, you don't want Hillary or Obama to win, so vote for me. Merely saying I'm a conservative look at this or that in my record is simply not enough. We know his record and that's the problem. He needs to continue with action by making a wise decision for a VP running mate and perhaps noting others that will advise him on such issues as SCOTUS justices, at the very least.

Regarding the VP pick, maybe I've been listening to Michael Medved's radio show too much, but a McCain/Huckabee ticket is spoken of far too often there. I've resigned myself to voting for McCain should he win the nomination, but is McCain foolish enough to choose Huckabee as his running mate? If he does, that may be a hurdle that I simply can't clear and staying home would be my decision.

John McCain has made his bed and he now has to sleep in it, or remake it enough so that fewer conservatives are completely repelled at the thought of voting for him. A difficult task if words are the only thing offered. McCain talks much about how the nation didn't trust government to secure the border, that the federal government had no credibility on the issue. Well, my friend, you have little credibility yourself on a number of major issues. Good luck repairing that with enough conservatives by just making a speech.

---

Filed under: Politics

Trackposted to: Right Pundits, Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary's Thoughts, A Blog For All, A Newt One- Shared News!, Right Truth, DragonLady's World, A Newt One- BIG THURSDAY GUEST!, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog's Weblog, Cao's Blog, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, Allie is Wired, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Wolf Pangloss, Dumb Ox Daily News, A Newt One, Stageleft, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Technorati tags: -- -- -- -- -- --
Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions

New drinking game


John McCain will speak at CPAC, the grassroots conservative conference, tomorrow. A good time to take a slight break from this political campaign season, or at least deaden our senses to the pain that may be inflicted upon us soon.

Materials needed:

  • Alcohol
  • shot glasses
  • Photo of Michael Medved

Every time McCain says (variations count):

My friends = 1 shot and poke a fellow conservative in the eye

Important Safety tip!

Before said pokeage, please review the safety note on this page (scroll down), to see how to do this without injuring any more conservatives than McCain and his supporters already have. As the game progresses and the safety technique demonstrated is becoming too difficult to apply correctly, a smack to the back of the head is acceptable.

We may disagree = 2 shots and yell NO SHIT SHERLOCK!!

I supported Robert Bork = 3 shots and hurl invectives at the photo of Michael Medved

It's probably a good thing that there will not be a live feed of CPAC and only video clips and transcripts will be available to work with eventually. It would be unfortunate if people couldn't make it to work over the next few days. That drop in production and the ensuing affect on the economy might require Congress to wrangle out another income redistribution, deficit increasing economic stimulus package months and months after the fact.

---

Filed under: Politics

Trackposted to: Right Pundits, Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary's Thoughts, A Blog For All, A Newt One- Shared News!, Right Truth, DragonLady's World, A Newt One- BIG THURSDAY GUEST!, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog's Weblog, Cao's Blog, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, Allie is Wired, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Wolf Pangloss, Dumb Ox Daily News, A Newt One, Stageleft, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions

Monday, February 04, 2008

Politics, fun fun fun


Or in other words, ARRGHHHH!

That appears to be the mood of many conservatives with the choices we have left and super Tuesday looming and possibly making clear who the Republican candidate will be for the election. McCain, who so enjoys poking conservatives in the eye and co-sponsoring major liberal legislation or Mitt Romney, conservative - lately, who will be facing the flip flop charge in a general election, fair or not.

What's that word again? Oh yes, ARRRGHHHH!

That being said with great enthusiasm by some (many?) conservatives who then say they will sit out the election if John McCain is the choice. Worse yet, is Ann Coulter jumping the shark (again?) when she says she'll campaign for Hillary! over McCain.

The sitting out idea goes something like this. It will teach the Republican party a lesson. They'll see that conservatives need to be courted, rather than simply dismissed. Well yes, I've considered that myself. It's much easier to not vote, than to vote with little to no enthusiasm just to reject the other option. But that seems much to clever a strategery for it's own good. What's to prevent the GOP from lurching further to the left, since it's been abandoned by conservatives? After all, the goal is to win elections, principles are secondary. Haven't we seen enough evidence of that even from conservatives who have long supported McCain? Yes, he's an apostate on some big issues, but he can win the election. At least the current polls, before intense media scrutiny of the man, say that.

Considering the uproar in conservatism, I think this electable mantra is a bit overdone. Are there really enough independents and moderates to make up for the possible no show of conservatives who can't bring themselves to vote for the man? I guess we may find out. It would be unfortunate for the lesson for some to be that putting a number of conservative principles in the background is not the way to win an election.

Then there are some who on Tuesday may write in what they believe is a real conservative. Unfortunately, Fred Thompson is not running anymore and this message will only help McCain win the nomination. Again, what lesson will be learned, other than winning means not going right anymore?

Sadly, my state doesn't vote tomorrow. My eventual choice may mean nothing at the end of the day. Then again, things may still be undecided and my vote will mean something. So who do I vote for?

To paraphrase a convenient target of McCain's, we fight the political game with the politicians we have. Yes, I would prefer Fred Thompson, but I have to choose between John McCain or Mitt Romney at this point.

I choose Mitt Romney. He's very flawed, but he doesn't seem to enjoy sticking it to conservatives while saving his cooing and cuddling for liberals. In other words, I see him as less problematic on issues then John McCain. I don't see McCain as superior to Mitt Romney because of the flip flop charge. Quite simply, I don't see McCain as a straight talker, except in the eyes of  his media darlings. I also don't trust McCain with regard to judicial appointments, a very important issue to me.

I also must consider what I'll do if McCain wins the nomination. I have thought about just staying home. However, the complete idiocy of the Democrat challengers exceeds the massive foolishness McCain has demonstrated at times. What lesson we think can be taught to the Republican party may come at the expense of this country in ways we have only imagined till now. It will take effort, but I'm pretty sure I can vote for McCain without throwing up. The only problem left is if he chooses Mike Huckabee for his running mate. I've seen McCain supporters say he isn't that stupid, but ambition can have it's own sort of stupidity.

Come to think of it, with all the threats going around, it seems that ambition at winning elections and teaching a party this or that lesson are potentially creating a competition of stupid actions this election cycle.

What's that word again?

---

Filed  under: Politics

Trackposted to: Right Pundits, Rosemary's Thoughts, A Blog For All, guerrilla radio, Right Truth, A Newt One- Shared News!, DragonLady's World, Cao's Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog's Weblog, The Pet Haven, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Wolf Pangloss, CORSARI D'ITALIA, Dumb Ox Daily News, A Newt One, Right Voices, Stageleft, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions










Creative Commons License


As defined and limited by the license, any use of work from this blog, must be attributed to Mark K. Sprengel and include a link back to this blog.




Get updates by e-mail:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Widgetize! Subscribe Social Bookmark Blogs that link here
My Technorati profile


Also, follow me on Twitter

Search this blog:

powered by Aditya


Recent Comments: