adcount=1;
"A cruel debate opponent" "Pagan blasphemer" "Reverse-iconoclast" "don't get pissed at him b/c he pwn yalls whiney asses"
My Photo
Name:
Location: Indiana, United States

Miscellaneous meanderings and philosophical ramblings. The title from a spiral notebook I used to jot down my thoughts on religion and other matters some years ago. I like to write, think and express my views on various issues. Robust discussion is welcome.


Chris of Rights and Charles Martin <-- Lists of debunked Sarah Palin rumors

"Lan astaslem."
I will not submit. I will not surrender.
Choose your language: Francais/French Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Portugues/Portuguese Espanol/Spanish 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

CNN - pay us and we will air your lies


No one will ever convince me that the MSM is nuetral or biased to the right (LMAO) when something like this happens.

Per Drudge:

CABLE CONTROVERSY: CNN AGREES TO AIR BLOODY ABORTION AD ON JUDGE ROBERTS
Tue Aug 09 2005 19:41:54 ET

CNN has reviewed and agreed to run a controversial ad produced by a pro-abortion group’s that falsely accuses Supreme Court nominee John Roberts of filing legal papers supporting a convicted abortion clinic bomber, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The news network has agreed to a $125,000 ad buy from NARAL for a commercial which depicts a bombed out 1998 Birmingham, AL abortion clinic. The Birmingham clinic was bombed seven years after Roberts signed the legal briefing the ad question!

The linking of Roberts to "violent fringe groups" is the sharpest attack against the nominee thus far.

However, the non-partisan University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Factcheck.org reviewed the NARAL ad and found it to be “false.”

Factcheck.org found "in words and images, the ad conveys the idea that Roberts took a legal position excusing bombing of abortion clinics, which is false."

The Republican National Committee is preparing to send a letter to television stations asking them to pull the spot, according to sources.

The RNC’s letter claims: "NARAL's ad is a deliberate misrepresentation of the facts that has no purpose but to mislead the American people."

Developing...

Factcheck.org has a detailed analysis and they conclude:

  • The ad is false.

  • And the ad misleads

  • The images used in the ad are especially misleading.

  • The ad fails to mention

  • The brief that Roberts signed, and on which the NARAL ad is based, is from another matter entirely

  • The ad uses the classic tactic of guilt by association

  • Whatever one thinks of Bray, Terry, or Operation Rescue, it is misleading to say that Roberts supported them.

  • But it is false to suggest that Roberts supported the actions of "violent" groups or clinic bombers because he argued that a law aimed at the Ku Klux Klan could not be used against those who blockade abortion clinics.

  • Of course, all of that didn'tt stop CNN from accepting the money to air such a hideous and false charge. If Rather and Mapes had to go at cBS for Rathergate, then a few heads at CNN should roll for this idiocy.

    I wonder if CNN would run an ad mentioning Kennedy, Chappaquiddick and Mary Jo Kopechne. Apparently $125,000 is all one needs to air obvious lies. Telling the truth should be much cheaper. Though I have no reason whatsoever to believe that CNN is concerned with what is true.
    Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions
    << Home










    Click for Latest Posts

    Creative Commons License


    As defined and limited by the license, any use of work from this blog, must be attributed to Mark K. Sprengel and include a link back to this blog.




    Get updates by e-mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Widgetize! Subscribe Social Bookmark Blogs that link here
    My Technorati profile


    Also, follow me on Twitter

    Search this blog:

    powered by Aditya


    Recent Comments: