adcount=1;
"A cruel debate opponent" "Pagan blasphemer" "Reverse-iconoclast" "don't get pissed at him b/c he pwn yalls whiney asses"
My Photo
Name:
Location: Indiana, United States

Miscellaneous meanderings and philosophical ramblings. The title from a spiral notebook I used to jot down my thoughts on religion and other matters some years ago. I like to write, think and express my views on various issues. Robust discussion is welcome.


Chris of Rights and Charles Martin <-- Lists of debunked Sarah Palin rumors

"Lan astaslem."
I will not submit. I will not surrender.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Brutality with a taser?


At the University of Florida campus during a John Kerry speech, Andrew Meyer, a journalism student, tried to ask the Senator several questions. Judging from some of the videos and eyewitness reports, the kid was disrupting the event by going past his allotted time, despite having been asked to move away from the microphone. Does such action deserve what happened?

HotAir links to the video here and includes another video that is eerily similar.

Michelle Malkin has some eyewitness accounts here.

I think with all the information currently available, it's obvious that campus security acted inappropriately. The embarrassment and humiliation this kid must now endure could have been avoided if they had just turned the juice up a bit more. Letting the kid have the ability to scream OW! OW! OW!!! like a little girl was cruel and inhumane punishment.

At the very least, they could have upped the shock to any of the levels above what they chose.

Level 04 Drop' em immediately
Level 03 Grit teeth and drop' em
Level 02 Cuss and swear manfully and drop' em
Level 01 Cuss and swear like a sissy and drop' em
Level 00 Scream OW! OW! OW!!! like a little girl whilst flailing about like a sissy

Dennis Miller has a t-shirt commemorating this event here.

*oops* Not only did I forget the link when I posted, it appears they don't have this available yet. Here is the Dennis Miller Show store for when they do, if they do.

Helpful tip.

If you disrupt an event and then resist a number of security guards or police instead of leaving as requested, all while trying to incite a crowd against them, and then say - Don't taze me bro!

What the heck do you think is going to happen?

In all seriousness, he was resisting their request to leave the microphone and infringing on everyone else's right to hear what they were there for. That was even after being allowed to ask his question. When they tried to move him, he then resisted and arguably tried to incite the audience against the campus security.

I would say the problem with the security guards is that they were not trained in how to restrain someone without having to use a taser. Then again, such techniques can result in dislocated joints if the person continues to struggle and they are quite painful even without that.

Lucky for OW!! OW!!! OWW!!! boy, those who trained the campus security probably have some pockets that can be mined by an aggressive attorney.

Too bad for him that won't remove the spread of this video across the Internet and airwaves. heh

---

Filed under: NewsPolitics

Trackposted to: Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, Right Truth, Big Dog's Weblog, DragonLady's World, Leaning Straight Up, The Amboy Times, Adeline and Hazel, Pursuing Holiness, third world county, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Right Voices, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, DeMediacratic Nation, Adam's Blog, Inside the Northwest Territory, Nuke's News & Views, Webloggin, Conservative Cat, Conservative Thoughts, Rosemary\'s Thoughts, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Wake Up America, Blue Star Chronicles, Republican National Convention Blog, CORSARI D'ITALIA, High Desert Wanderer, The Yankee Sailor, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Technorati tags: -- -- --
Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions

Monday, September 17, 2007

OTA Open Trackback 09.17.07


As the lovely Samantha Burns says:

Please use this space to trackback your best, main page articles (I just require a link to this article, as always). Also, if you have something to discuss, it is welcomed here as well.

ADVICE: Trackback main blog page articles to showcase your work (and it will help to attract readers).

Yep, I was in a plagiarizing mood ;-) Nevertheless, it's a good way to draw more attention to your blog, so trackback away :-) I'll have one of these each Monday, because, well, I hate Mondays ;-p

Please refrain from using international accent marks in your post URL. The inline trackback script will fail if those are used.

Do NOT link your open trackback post here. Use Linkfest Haven instead.

63126210_cf86211d09_o

More trackback partys, open posts and linkfests can be found at:

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis

Get the code for this blogroll
Add this Blogroll to your site


Filed under: OpenTrackback

Disclaimer: trackbacks do not necessarily represent the opinions or standards of Mark My Words

Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Plenty of shame to go around


Northwest Indiana had some controversy brewing the last few days over a story that the owner of a Crown Point Dunkin' Donuts had refused to serve a U.S. serviceman. According to the account, going around by email, the owner had refused the soldier for, as he said, "killing my countrymen."

One problem, the story appears to be only an urban legend, as the following reveals:

The e-mail blasted into cyberspace under the patriotic heading, "Americanism," followed by red, white and untrue allegations against a foreign-born business owner who refused to serve a local soldier for "killing my countrymen."

As is typical in such cases, the good news, that this didn't happen, is very much overshadowed by the bad news. People having threatened to boycott, some have told customers they should leave. Even worse, threats of violence had been made against the store.

The editorial spends a good deal of time criticizing those who jumped to believing the store owner was guilty, as the story claimed.

Sure it's easy to blame Templin, Roth and anyone else who allowed "lunchroom chatter" to inflame our racism, and also to singe a local business owner.

But blame isn't enough here.

Shame on those of us who blindly believed the e-mail's content. And shame on those of us who stupidly forwarded it. But more importantly, shame on those of us who wanted so badly to believe it to be true.

This shouldn't be what "Americanism" is all about. (source)

While criticism is deserved, unfortunately there is a group that is not held to account in the editorial. Of course there are some, and far too many, who assume such a story is true, simply because the individual is not "American", some drawing that conclusion based on color and accent alone, but others may have believed for another reason. It's not always about racism, whether unrealized or gleefully practiced.

This story and others like it, occur in an environment where some Americans, pale as can be and/or with non-foreigner accented English, feel free to speak of this country and our troops in just as hateful a fashion as alleged in the Dunkin' Donuts story. Democrat Congressman John Murtha may not have refused donut service to any troops, but he did accuse them of murdering civilians, before they had been convicted in trial. As it turns out, charges against several marines have been dropped. Will Democrat Congressman John Murtha apologize?

Such foolishness was sadly no exception when one considers the extreme left. Another instance would be Democrat Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois. His addition to this hateful view of our troops was to compare them to the Nazis and Pol Pot. His "apology" doing little to nothing to erase the propaganda sound bite he freely gave to our enemy.

Another example would be Democrat Senator Barack Obama, likening our strategy in Afghanistan to just bombing villages and killing civilians. We support the troops... rings rather hollow when such words stumble out of the mouth at other times.

The list goes on and includes some of Hollywood's elite. The most recent and obvious being Brian De Palma making a movie that, according to his own statements, is intended to make our troops look bad.

A new film about the real-life rape and killing of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl by U.S. soldiers who also murdered her family stunned the Venice festival, with shocking images that left some viewers in tears.

[...]

"The movie is an attempt to bring the reality of what is happening in Iraq to the American people," he told reporters after a press screening.

"The pictures are what will stop the war. One only hopes that these images will get the public incensed enough to motivate their Congressmen to vote against this war," he said. (source thanks to Libertas)

Is it too much to ask that this reality also include the terrorists who brutally behead innocents? Or that those troops have been tried and convicted and that their terrible actions are not the norm? And what of the horrible reality that will follow should De Palma succeed and we withdraw from Iraq before we've finished the job?

Is it any wonder that in such a climate some, who are not racist, would easily believe a story wherein someone refuses serving our troops because they're killing his people? After all, elected officials and Hollywood glitterati have nearly said the same and you're not supposed to question their patriotism for doing so.

This doesn't mean that racists have no great shame to accept, or that whoever originated the lie has no responsibility to bear. Those who didn't at least check the matter out before doing a copy/paste to their email list, share at least some of this disgrace as well. However, the extreme left or any other extreme that speaks against our troops in similar fashion, likewise have much guilt to bear.

When an environment exists where some of our politicians or pop stars will say vile things about our soldiers, and during a time of war, why should one be surprised or skeptical when it's said that someone else expressed similar sentiments? Certainly there is enough shame to go around to include those who actively, with forethought or simply foolishness, work to create the very ground where such false stories can easily be seen to have taken root.

---

Filed under: OurSoldiers -- News -- Iraq -- Culture

Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, Right Truth, Big Dog's Weblog, Shadowscope, DragonLady's World, Stuck On Stupid, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Adeline and Hazel, Stageleft, Pursuing Holiness, Right Celebrity, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The Uncooperative Radio Show!, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, CommonSenseAmerica, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, Church and State, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, DeMediacratic Nation, Adam's Blog, Inside the Northwest Territory, Nuke's News & Views, , Webloggin, Cao's Blog, The Bullwinkle Blog, , Conservative Cat, Conservative Thoughts, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Faultline USA, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Walls of the City, Blue Star Chronicles, Planck's Constant, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, CORSARI D'ITALIA, High Desert Wanderer, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Technorati tags: -- -- --
Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions

Sunday, September 02, 2007

Open educational resources


I recently became aware of these educational programs. One of the nice things is being free, on the other hand, they don't grant degrees or provide credits.

Wikipedia has an overview here.

The term "open educational resources" was first adopted at UNESCO's 2002 Forum on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Open educational resources are educational materials and resources offered freely and openly for anyone to use and under some licenses re-mix, improve and redistribute. [...]

I found out about this when someone noted (sarcastically) that MIT's OpenCourseWare has an old article I wrote, in the reading list for one of the courses.

The article is in the Experimental Study Group, the undergraduate course Current Events and Social Issues. In the readings list, it's at week 11 "Should abortion be regulated?", and references an article I wrote in 1999 and eventually submitted to Abortionfacts.com which is run by Heritage House. I was rather surprised to learn of this and may submit a more recent article(s) to Abortionfacts.com.

I'm sure there are other similar programs out there just a Google search away. If one doesn't have the money, but would like to still learn, these are worth checking out.

---

Filed under: Misc.

Trackposted to: Perri Nelson's Website, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary's Thoughts, Right Truth, Stuck On Stupid, Leaning Straight Up, third world county, Right Celebrity, Woman Honor Thyself, The Uncooperative Radio Show!, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, CommonSenseAmerica, Right Voices, Church and State, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, DeMediacratic Nation, Adam's Blog, Inside the Northwest Territory, Nuke's News & Views, , Webloggin, The Bullwinkle Blog, Cao's Blog, , Conservative Cat, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Allie Is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, and CORSARI D'ITALIA, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Trackback URI                             Submit this post on Digg.com! width=                     View blog reactions










Creative Commons License


As defined and limited by the license, any use of work from this blog, must be attributed to Mark K. Sprengel and include a link back to this blog.




Get updates by e-mail:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Widgetize! Subscribe Social Bookmark Blogs that link here
My Technorati profile


Also, follow me on Twitter

Search this blog:

powered by Aditya


Recent Comments: